Industry voices tax bill disapproval

by Paydayloans24705 Dec 2017
One of the country’s largest industry associations has expressed its opposition to the Senate Tax Reform Bill, which was released late last week

“NAMB is opposing the Senate Tax Reform bill released (last week).  NAMB believes several of these changes will cause an immediate negative impact on consumers wishing to purchase a home.  This will affect housing prices and could immediately impact home values,” the National Association of Mortgage Brokers wrote in an open letter.  “Two areas of the Senate Tax bill need amending – 1.) The provision excluding state and local taxes (SALT) and 2.) A provision harming companies dealing with mortgage servicing - monthly payments and tax payments.”

Republicans muscled the largest tax overhaul in 30 years through the Senate early Saturday, taking a big step toward giving President Donald Trump his first major legislative triumph after months of false starts and frustration on other fronts.

“Just what the country needs to get growing again,'' Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said in an interview after a final burst of negotiation closed in on a nearly $1.5 trillion package that impacts the breadth of American society.

He shrugged off polls finding scant public enthusiasm for the measure, saying the legislation would prove its worth. “Big bills are rarely popular,'' he said. “You remember how unpopular 'Obamacare' was when it passed?''

Trump on Saturday tweeted his thanks to Senate and House Republicans as they now begin trying to reconcile differences in legislation passed by both chambers, a behind-closed-doors process that is expected to move swiftly. Trump is aiming to sign the tax package into law before Christmas. “Biggest Tax Bill and Tax Cuts in history just passed in the Senate,'' he tweeted inaccurately. The overhaul is significant but far from the largest.

Presiding over the Senate, Vice-President Mike Pence announced the 51-49 vote to applause from Republicans. Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., was the only lawmaker to cross party lines, joining the Democrats in opposition. The measure focuses its tax reductions on businesses and higher-earning individuals, gives more modest breaks to others and offers the boldest rewrite of the nation's tax system since 1986.

For its part, NAMB argues the bill negatively impacts Americans wishing to purchase a home.

“Consumers do not merely purchase a house, they purchase a place they seek to make their community.  Doubling of the standard deduction takes away any incentive to purchase a home and make a community connection. Doubling the standard deduction, in lieu of the mortgage interest deduction, dis-incentivizes homeownership,” the association said. “Homeownership is one of the main, if not the principal driver of building wealth for middle class Americans. 

“By removing financial incentives to invest in homeownership, these tax reforms may have the perverse effect of increasing the wealth gap between middle class Americans by destroying one of the most universal and reliable avenues for building wealth in America.”

With a file from Associated Press

Related stories:
Former Wells CEO: Slashing mortgage deduction would affect ‘people who can afford it’
Hensarling: Cordray’s resignation was ‘long overdue’


  • by Paul | 12/5/2017 11:51:20 AM

    Not sure what the NAMB is focusing on here.

    1) The State and Local tax deductions will be replaced by a higher standard deduction and will actually help most Americans. It will only hurt the top 5% and they already get plenty of tax breaks and can afford it anyway. Stopping the ultra rich from purchasing that 2nd, 3rd or 10th luxury home is not going to hurt the housing market.

    2) The provision taxing mortgage servicers in advance is again aimed at the ultra rich. Wells Fargo is not going to pay any additional taxes, just pay them earlier. Again, this only hurts the ultra rich and will do absolutely nothing to deter the average American home buyer from purchasing a home.

    The NAMB is showing who they actually care about here.


Should CFPB have more supervision over credit agencies?